An Abject Failure in Due Diligence and Judgment August 10, 2010
There are few shortcuts when it comes to hiring senior-level executive talent. And when firms are not careful, the price they pay can be exorbitant. Consider the true story of a company that paid a big price.
One Reason Interviewing Candidates is So Difficult July 13, 2010
I was browsing in my local bookstore on the weekend when I came upon a small book titled ‘Toughest Interview Questions'. Always interested in this subject I quickly leafed through it and put it in the pile to buy.
Strategies for those wanting to make a career or sector change June 23, 2010
Many transitional executives contemplate career changes. It may be a career auto or general manufacturing sector executive questioning its future, or a large-company type who covets the chance to work in a smaller organization. Often, it is simply individuals longing to shed unfulfilling careers for exotic destinations as yet unknown.
Executives in Transition- Why a rifle beats a shotgun in nabbing that perfect job June 21, 2010
As a headhunter I am an obligatory stop on the networking circuit of many executive job seekers. I hold the promise of a barometer on the employment market, contacts, ideas, and even suitable ongoing searches. I am always happy to participate in courtesy interviews as I neither envy the job seekers' circumstances nor take lightly their courage in reaching out to me.
The Perils of the Successful Matchmaker June 14, 2010
What is a successful matchmaker? Last week, the Wall Street Journal published an interview with Patti Stanger who runs The Millionaire's Club, a Los Angeles-based "elite" matchmaking service and reality television program.
Interviewing: The Quest for Patterns and Themes May 14, 2010
Last week, two seemingly unrelated articles caught my attention. The first was a magazine obituary on C.K. Prahalad, the management thinker best known for his work on core competencies. The article spoke extensively of his ‘big ideas' and noted his habit of traveling the world "prying useful information out of everyone he met…always looking for connections and patterns, hoping to predict change".
Checkers vs. Chess: Why Candidates Play The Wrong Interview Game…and Pay the Price ! May 4, 2010
I often join my clients when they conduct candidate interviews. I moderate, participate, listen and learn. They are fascinating glimpses into how candidates and companies alike play the complex game of talent acquisition.
The superhero hiring game and why everyone loses April 5, 2010
When it comes to recruiting leaders, companies continue to search for those Steve Jobs-like characters that can single-handedly turn around a company's fortunes, blaze paths of innovation and market their wares like no other before them.
Why candidates should expand and prep their references February 3, 2010
As headhunters scramble to match candidates with their shapeshifting clients, process and painstaking due diligence rule the day. To some candidates such rigor may feel intrusive or simply unnecessary. It shouldn't. In fact, rigor should be embraced and used to all candidates advantage. Consider the use of references as an illustration.
The Unwanted CEO Job …and the one individual who thought otherwise January 8, 2010
Several recent articles have lauded the success of Ottawa-based Bridgewater Systems. With skyrocketing revenues, a growing market, and money in the bank, the firm's prospects have never been better and the street appears to love the story. It was a much more difficult story to sell in 2003, with one notable exception.

The Upside of the Venture Capital Crisis

I profess no special insight into what really goes on inside the Canadian venture capital world. I am not part of the esteemed club, do not possess the insider’s secret decoder ring and am not a confidant to anyone who has one. Instead, my vantage point is down the food chain looking up, a service provider selling to, working for, and dependent upon this community for part of my livelihood.

These days, one need not be an insider to sense that the venture capital sector is in a funk, a condition which has been rich fodder for the gossip and rumor mills. Such and such a firm is struggling to raise its next fund, this or that labor sponsored fund is toast, such and such a firm will raise far less than expected, so and so is on his way out the door. Occasionally, real news interrupts the frenzy, such as RIM’s new fund or Roynat’s decision to exit the venture business altogether. But the word on the page has little chance in a race against the word on the street and soon we are run amok with scuttlebutt and innuendos once again. While such goings-on are pure schadenfreude for some, for most of us the health of the venture capital sector is a matter of great concern.

Given the unsettled mood, I decided to attend my first CVCA annual event which was held this year in Montreal. The event seemed well attended with an array of interesting panel discussions and high profile speakers. But if I had to distil the dominant take-away image (outside of the Crosby, Stills and Nash look-alike American VC whose band played at the dinner) it would be the sea of fingers pointing every which way in search of those culpable for the damaged state of the great venture nation. Take your pick…macroeconomic forces, government myopia, the credit crunch, the shortage of good entrepreneurs, the lack of industry critical mass, structural problems, etc. etc. etc.

But while these swirling forces are undoubtedly affecting the industry as a whole, it seemed odd that the attendees spent so little time talking about the thousand pound, lifeless gorilla plopped in the middle of the conference room…..performance, or more specifically, the poor performance of so many of the firms. If, as has been widely reported, the performance of many Canadian venture capital firms has been let us just say modest, then the search for culprits in the current fundraising crisis should at least include a drive to the closest full length mirror.
Oddly enough, self-reflection and navel gazing did not appear to be high on the CVCA agenda this year. There was not a lot of talk about lessons learned, best practices among the more successful Canadian firms, how professional development can be improved, or in fact how the whole industry can be improved. There was not a lot of talk about models, the assumptions on which they are built, or the extent to which they need to be tweaked to stay relevant in a rapidly changing world. This is especially regrettable as there certainly is a lot of talk about these issues in the markets they serve.

Also, one would have thought that the veneer of certainty, dare I say hubris, which so characterized a percentage of this population, might have been washed off by the inclement weather of poor performance and the damage it has inflicted on the sector. But based on what I saw at the CVCA, for some, a yet stronger solvent appears to be needed. Until that time however, soul-searching and the growth that it promises will not occur, attitudes and behaviors will not change, skills will not improve, wisdom will not be found and success will not come. And that’s why there is an upside of these downtimes, for trying as they may be, they will flush out some and mature others. And that will benefit the venture capital industry and the tech sector as a whole.