As a headhunter I am an obligatory stop on the networking circuit of many executive job seekers. I hold the promise of a barometer on the employment market, contacts, ideas, and even suitable ongoing searches. I am always happy to participate in courtesy interviews as I neither envy the job seekers’ circumstances nor take lightly their courage in reaching out to me.
However, after participating in hundreds of such interviews over the years I am ever less inclined to serve as a passive sounding board, listening patiently as executives list their wants and preferences. Instead, I have taken to challenging what I am told, not to embarrass or discourage, but rather to nudge the job seekers into making the most of the journeys before them.
Among the most common and ill-conceived opening lines that I hear is, “I am interested in finding a company, large or small, which requires expertise in anything from turnaround situations to high growth”. Intuitively, most job seekers believe that it is wise to frame their job search broadly, thereby enhancing the pool of opportunities for which they may be considered. It is akin to choosing a shotgun over a rifle in the hopes of hitting something, anything. And while it is difficult to advise candidates against expanding their job choices, the truth is that the strategy often backfires.
First, casting a wide net complicates rather than simplifies the task at hand. How do you conduct an effective job search when the target market includes large, medium and small companies running the gamut of high growth through to turnaround? This may not be an insurmountable problem in smaller communities where every firm can be identified, but in large metropolitan areas the target market proves to be everywhere and nowhere. How do you plan an effective job search when every path is a full-time pursuit? When job opportunities do surface, they become islands onto themselves with the job seeker jumping from one to another never building momentum or depth of understanding in any given one. Scattered and unfocused, the search strategy generates activity but few results.
Second, the odds are high that despite your assertions, you are not equally suited to managing both large companies and small let alone across the full spectrum of situations faced by them. Early stage companies require different skills than large corporations, as do turnarounds from high growth, and it is likely that your portfolio of skills, personality and experiences skew better to some more than others. While you may argue, and many do, that leadership and management skills transcend firm size, life stage or context, be prepared for more than a few skeptics who will question whether you really understand, or are being honest about your strengths and abilities. By casting yourself as a multifaceted, adaptable generalist you not only increase the chances of making a poor job decision you also unwittingly shift the onus onto the hiring organization to sort where you really belong. Since many potential employers are not up to that task, they will struggle with whether the self-described ‘generalist’ before them can deliver the specialist results they seek.
A better alternative starts with some serious soul-searching on the themes that have cut across your career, the successes, stumbles, lessons learned and what is most important to you and your family going forward. You narrow in on a few key areas of interests and strength and extend your job search outwards in concentric circles of best fit. When you meet headhunters and potential employers, you walk us through where, how and why you have thrived in the past and explain how these inform your preferences going forward. You impress with your self-awareness and the clarity of future you envision for yourself. The shotgun is shelved in favor of the more narrowly targeted rifle and you significantly increase the odds of hitting the target role you covet.
Now let’s talk about those wants and preferences…
About Author
Robert Hebert, PhD is Managing Partner of Executive Search Firm StoneWood Group Inc. He can be reached @ rhebert@stonewoodgroup.com or at 416.365.9494x777
Looking for a dynamic HR role? Stay away from the entrepreneurial tech sector.
January 1, 2012
In a recent survey of HR graduate students, the technology sector rated among the most coveted destinations to ply their trade. It is viewed as a world of innovative people, technologies and approaches where progressive talent management, OB/OD and related HR work awaits.
The Cry to Replace RIM's CEOs – A Truly Dumb Idea
October 13, 2011
Leaving aside the recent service outages, the shellacking of RIM in the press is a tad surreal to behold.
For the few Luddites not familiar with the firm, Research in Motion is the successful Canadian smart phone pioneer with revenues of $20bb per year, no debt and cash in the bank. They manufacture products that remain popular around the world and continue to boast technological innovations unmatched by any competitor. Their most recently launched smart phone devices have been well reviewed and appear to be selling well. And though the company's first version of its new tablet, the Playbook, has room for improvement, it is a promising piece of technology.
Context: When Companies Confuse Start-up Experience for Start-up Experience
October 7, 2011
I had the occasion this week to chat with an entrepreneur still licking his wounds from a stalled startup venture. His tale is a reminder of how easily companies misunderstand organizational context when hiring. For startups, such a misunderstanding can be fatal.
The CEO Hiring Practices at HP
October 3, 2011
The press tells us that Hewlett Packard is the largest technology company in the world with revenues of $126bb. Impressive as those numbers may appear, they do not seem to impress HP's Board of Directors. You see they do not believe that any of the firm's 324,600 employees are capable of leading it. Not one person. Not this year or last year when CEO changes were made. In fact they were apparently not capable six years ago or even eleven years ago when CEO changes were also made. But before summarily indicting the firm's succession planning/leadership development programs, it is useful to consider the track record of the external candidates who were considered better choices than the firm's internal candidates. This analysis decidedly shifts the spotlight to the competence of Hewlett Packard's Board of Directors.
The Folly of Believing What You Read
September 19, 2011
Some time ago we posted a blog titled ‘So you REALLY want to be a CEO?' which looked at the human costs of climbing the upper rungs of the management ladder. The blog was based on a series of articles immediately following the ‘resignation' of Pfizer CEO Jeff Kindler. All of these articles presented a cautionary tale of life in the fast lane, the long hours, the extensive global travel, and the shareholder pressures that accompany an uncooperative stock price. They also spoke poignantly of the physical and emotional toll that such unrelenting pressure took on the Pfizer CEO who eventually resigned in order to attend to his family and health. As it turns out however, much of this narrative may not have been true
Before sending us your resume (and then getting frustrated with us) ask who we work for
July 25, 2011
A friend of mine is a trustee in bankruptcy. As his title suggests, he and his firm serves those contemplating the ‘cleansing' process of personal bankruptcy. Potential customers compare service providers, select one, and then pay the chosen firm a fee to initiate and manage the ensuing process on their behalf. However, as soon as the relief-seeking customer signs on the dotted line, the trustee's allegiance shifts to the creditors for whom they then seek to maximize debt recovery. This shift in who works for whom must be a tad unsettling for people who already have a heap of problems and stress on their hands.
What Dating Services Can Teach Companies About Hiring
June 1, 2011
Executive-level hiring is a decidedly aspirational endeavor. Organizations idealize their workplace cultures, select for attributes that will fit into those romanticized environments, and then immerse unsuspecting hires into their ice-cold reality of their works-in-progress.
How to Survive a Startup - by Jill Ram
April 20, 2011
If you're an executive and you're thinking of joining a start-up, know what stage of a start-up to join. If the company is in its first year or so, don't expect to make significant changes. If you join after the company is somewhat established and mistakes have been made and learned from, you'll likely be more successful from the outset. If the founder has stepped aside, well, by then, the company is likely not considered a start-up anymore. It won't be functioning like a big company yet, and it won't have all the structure in place that it needs, but it will be run with more practicality and with less emotion. Timing is everything so choose it well.
Good News for the Old, Overqualified and Overlooked
March 18, 2011
It is expected that a significant percentage of the baby boomer generation will drive right past the Freedom 55 highway exit. For many the goal of early retirement will have proven to be unattainable hype, while for others the ups and downs of working will appear more attractive than the prospects of working up and down the local lawn bowling leadership board.
Pressed for time? Blame those Benedictine Monks.
February 24, 2011
It is among the principal reasons candidates tell us they are open to consider a change in employers. They are tethered to it, yet somehow it still flees. It is time, the most precious of resources, and for many harried executives they want some of it back.
Though their relationship with time may be strained, it is worth pointing out that it was not always this way. In his fascinating book Time Wars, Jeremy Rifkin chronicles the evolution of our modern relationship with time. He points out that in traditional agrarian and pastoral cultures, time was a very naturalistic notion maintained in cyclical, repetitive, biological and even sacred terms. The ‘passing of time' was cued via the changing seasons, biological lifecycles and lunar patterns and thus, the cadence and tempo of those societies were finely tuned to the cyclical rhythms of their physical environments. As he states, "Our early ancestors coveted the circle, perceiving time as eternal return, a ceaseless repetition of an endless cycle of birth, life, death, and rebirth". Since these cyclical rhythms could neither be accelerated, nor altered, the cadence of these societies' was natural and harmonious.
Executives in Transition- Why a rifle beats a shotgun in nabbing that perfect job
June 21, 2010