Why candidates should expand and prep their references February 3, 2010
As headhunters scramble to match candidates with their shapeshifting clients, process and painstaking due diligence rule the day. To some candidates such rigor may feel intrusive or simply unnecessary. It shouldn't. In fact, rigor should be embraced and used to all candidates advantage. Consider the use of references as an illustration.
The Unwanted CEO Job …and the one individual who thought otherwise January 8, 2010
Several recent articles have lauded the success of Ottawa-based Bridgewater Systems. With skyrocketing revenues, a growing market, and money in the bank, the firm's prospects have never been better and the street appears to love the story. It was a much more difficult story to sell in 2003, with one notable exception.
Hiring Executive Talent: The Sheepish Canadian Startup December 26, 2009
Much is written about the state of the Canadian tech startup sector and why it lags the US, Israel and other countries in producing a richer community of world-class companies. While I am not qualified to comment on many of the contributing factors I am witness to how Canadian startups hire and lever talent at key points in their growth. I would argue that for many of these firms the bar excellence is set so cautiously low that to expect anything but mediocrity is laughable. Let me provide a recent example.
To The Candidates I Will Offend Next Week December 3, 2009
As a condition of being released from custody, the brilliant yet troubled title character in the movie Good Will Hunting must meet regularly with a counselor. Determined to sabotage the process he torments and is dismissed by a series of psychologists until he is sent to ‘Sean' played by Robin Williams.
The Talent Game in Venture-Backed Firms November 13, 2009
Last week I met the CEO of a recently funded tech firm (yes, it still happens) who described at length his plans to build his business. As he spoke of his young executive team, its successes to date, and his plans to lever the new funding round to conquer the world, he exuded the sense of invincibility that comes with youth and the validation of funding. Afterwards, as I reflected on our meeting, part of me hoped that underneath the bravado was an individual who was as least a little frightened, for if he bothered to peruse his new venture partners' playbook, he would know that he is anything but invincible.
What it takes to Climb to the Top – The Case for Grit October 14, 2009
If intelligence is the best predictor of achievement what accounts for the wide range of achievement among individuals of equal IQ? Professor Angela Duckworth studies this question for a living and believes she has the answer
Why Recruiting from the Best Companies is Perilous September 26, 2009
If you long to be taken to Shangri-la, that fictional, mystical, utopian oasis of harmony and love, what kind of person do you hire to help you get there? Do you recruit a lifelong resident, intimate with the ways of the land, or someone trained in navigating the treacherous jungles to the western end of the Kunlun Mountains where it is said to be located?
Creativity: Hardwired or A Skill We Can All Develop? September 17, 2009
This week the Globe and Mail published an article titled "How to Shine Again After A Year of Gloom" in which employees as well as candidates looking for jobs are urged to emphasize their creativity as a means of differentiating themselves in the marketplace. This appealed to me as great advice, provided you are one of the few people who actually are creative. For everyone else it is a waste of time.
Why Best Practices Can Be So Dangerous September 10, 2009
I recently dusted off Jim Collins' book Good to Great. For those who have forgotten, the book compiles a list of companies that have achieved ‘greatness' over a period of 15 years and then analyzes them in order to "discover the essential and distinguishing factors at work". The resulting best practices of these best companies has been a bestseller since 2001.
This Week's Leadership Changes at OLG and NHLPA September 3, 2009
Two high profile firings took place this week. Both shed light on how boards of directors and the big-named international headhunters who advise them make questionable decisions. The first involved the CEO of Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation who was dismissed along with the majority of the firm's board of directors. Published reports suggested that topping the list of Kelly McDougald's purported transgressions was her failure to deliver wholesale culture change at the government run monopoly. If this was in fact her primary mandate, it is reasonable to look at her credentials going into the job.

The Unwanted CEO Job …and the one individual who thought otherwise

Several recent articles have lauded the success of Ottawa-based Bridgewater Systems. With skyrocketing revenues, a growing market, and money in the bank, the firm’s prospects have never been better. The street appears to love the story. But it was a much more difficult story to sell in 2003, with one notable exception.

Bridgewater was founded in 1997, one of many Newbridge spinouts, a graduate if you will of the Terry Matthews school of stellar startups. The first few years were bumpy as the firm struggled to find its place in the evolving IP telecom marketplace. Matters were made worse in 2000 when its main benefactor, Newbridge, was sold to Alcatel transferring in the process its equity position in Bridgewater. It can safely be assumed that tiny Bridgewater was not atop of the French behemoth’s list of priorities.

At one point, Bridgewater’s board of directors seriously contemplated abandoning the telecom market altogether. They hired Toronto-based Derek Smyth as CEO and tasked him with levering his extensive software experience to move Bridgewater into the enterprise marketplace. But it did not take long for Mr. Smyth to conclude that enterprise markets were not the answer. He quickly returned Bridgewater to the telecom marketplace and focused instead on improving the firm’s sales and marketing effectiveness. Over the next year company revenues and prospects began to improve. Unfortunately, adversity was just around the corner again when in 2003 the commuting weary Mr. Smyth made the difficult decision to leave Bridgewater to join venture-capital firm Edgestone Partners in Toronto. The board immediately set out to find a seasoned CEO to navigate the next leg of the company’s journey. Armed with a promising market, a team of 65 motivated employees and revenues approaching $10mm the board was optimistic that it could recruit an ‘A’ player to the organization. 

One can never be certain how the candidate market will respond to a given company/opportunity and surprises are not uncommon. In this instance, despite the company’s apparent promise and momentum, the North American candidate market yawned at the opportunity. Some executives dismissed Bridgewater’s technology as ‘too niche’, others argued that the breakthrough markets would never materialize while yet others scoffed that big-name competitors would ultimately destroy the firm. Still other candidates did not want to move to Ottawa or even commit to the commute. In the end, a great many of the targeted so-called ‘A’ candidates, the proven winners who had taken similar businesses to their new heights, declined. Even those who expressed interest did so skeptically, needing to be convinced. And while the board worked hard to educate them, several of these candidates turned down the opportunity after conducting their due diligence.

And then a certain individual raised his hand. Ed Ogonek was known and respected by several board members having turned-around Ottawa-based start-up Akara and sold it to Ciena. As a condition of that transaction Mr. Ogonek committed for a period to a senior role in Ciena making him unavailable to Bridgewater at the outset of the search. But as the search proceeded, circumstances changed at ever-changing Ciena and Mr. Ogonek expressed interest in Bridgewater. What made him different from almost every other high calibre candidate was the potential he immediately saw in the firm and his confidence that he could help realize that potential. Such certainty in a sea of naysayers, refreshing though it was, made him at the time either prescient or delusional. The firm’s stellar performance under his subsequent leadership has answered that question in no uncertain terms.

Bridgewater’s success can be attributed to many factors. These include market foresight, innovative technologies, the steadfast vision of founder/CTO Russ Freen, savvy positioning, and skillful execution. Bridgewater is also a Paul Masson story of ‘no wine before its time’. The company persevered long enough for its market and technology stars to align, much in the same way that they have at another decade-old Newbridge 'dog-to-darling' spinout, Dragonwave. But make no mistake this is also a story of good leadership, of the decisions made and the steps taken by the last two CEOs, especially those of one individual who could see the opportunities that so many others could not…and knew what to do about it. Hats off to Ed Ogonek and everyone at Bridgewater! They deserve all of the good fortune and accolades they receive..

Robert Hebert, PhD is Managing Partner of Toronto-based executive search firm StoneWood Group (www.stonewoodgroup.com). He can be reached @ rhebert@stonewoodgroup.com or at 416.365.9494x777